Wellbeing > GDP as Metric of National Progress

8 12 2011

The Sydney Morning Herald has kicked off an interesting ongoing feature looking at replacing gross domestic product as our default and singular metric for national and social progress. It has even commissioned an external consultancy, Lateral Economics, to develop an alternative metric, which they call the Wellbeing index.

Now, there are many ways to render such an index, and I don’t necessarily subscribe to the SMH’s method, but… I wholeheartedly support the notion that GDP is a terrible metric to reflect how our society is benefiting us as individuals. Of course, quantifying things is useful, and GPD is a nice well-defined metric. But as easy as it is to latch on to, it’s just not measuring the stuff that matters. And that’s wellbeing (whatever that is).

I touched on this in my earlier posts about the Occupy Wall Street movement.

The problem, I believe, also runs deeper than just GDP being a convenient quantification of national progress. It’s also tied to the Hayekian brand of free market liberalism that places too much stock in that economist’s Swiss army knife: utility.

If utility really did accurately represent our values and needs, and if we really were rational utility maximisers, and if utility was seamlessly factored into economics as the driver of monetary exchange, then utility really would be an incredibly powerful notion.

Utility, thus rendered, would factor in everything that is important, from material interests to our very moral proclivities. If something was morally repugnant, it would be reflected in its perceived utility, and the market would help eradicate it. Brilliant.

In such a worldview, a free market makes perfect sense. It’s the most potent device for maximising utility, thus its outcomes aren’t only efficient, but they’re morally justified almost by definition.

Sadly, utility just isn’t that perfect. What we perceive as having utility is easily manipulated from what makes us happy. We pursue fleeting pleasures at the expense of long term wellbeing. We pursue them to the point they make us sick, whether it be with stress, obesity or poverty. Information is not transparent, so even when we do have clear moral values, we can’t always choose exchanges that promote them. Instead we’re guided by price, regardless of whether the cheaper product is produced through a more efficient process or made at the hands of child labour.

Utility is flawed. And any system that equates maximising utility with promoting wellbeing fails.

This is why we need a new metric. One that does weave in externalities – positive, like health, education, happiness; and negative, like environmental impact, inequality and stress. GDP will be a crucial part of this metric, but not the only part.

As I’ve mentioned previously, the problem with economics is not it’s too broad, but that it’s not broad enough. The tools of economics are powerful. We just need to make sure we plug in the right variables and have them work for us, not the other way around.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

2 responses

9 12 2011
Nick

I would love for this conversation to be had in the US. Replacing GDP with a more robust and meaningful metric might actually improve some of the issues about which the OWSers are so hacked off.

I only hope that when this conversation is had in the US, the people actually listen and seriously consider the benefits. I have a feeling many will simply say, “Hell, I like measuring progress in terms of production and consumption. Onward American capitalism!” Like you have mentioned in your “Slow Revolution” post, this will also require many people to reorient their worldview and rethink their almost dogmatic philosophy of [consumption –> happiness].

Thanks for sharing this!

http://www.critiquemythinking.com

11 12 2011
GTChristie

I know you’ve been to my Moxie_Files blog, but I’d like to point out a member of my blogroll, Jules Evans at Politics of Well-Being. Over time, Jules has amassed a superb series of articles on this very subject, including profiles of its leading lights, philosophical roots, and why/how the UK is approaching this alternative to GDP. Wander around in that blog for awhile, if you have not done already. You will be impressed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: