What’s the Next Best Option?

19 06 2010

As an adjunct to yesterday’s post on holding our beliefs to account is another question with which we should challenge our beliefs: what’s the next best option?

Bailing out the banks might have its down sides, but it’s better than letting them fail. A watered down emissions trading scheme might not be ideal, but it’s better than nothing (the Australian Labor Party apparently disagrees). Democracy might be driven by populism and special interest groups, but it’s better than autocracy (or, as Winston Churchill famously put it: “democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried”).

Whenever we criticise something, we can’t just stop at that. We need to reflect upon the alternatives to the focus of our criticism and we need to ask ourselves whether the alternatives are any better. If they’re not, then we should temper our criticism and redirect our energies towards improving the current option rather than calling for its abandonment.

All too often I hear criticism that is entirely negative – often justified – but without presenting any realistic or preferable alternatives. Just because an option has downsides doesn’t mean it’s all bad. Taken at face value, this kind of criticism could imply that the best course is to abandon the current option and adopt an alternative. However, even if alternatives are proposed, they tend to be unrealistic, utopian or, occasionally, even worse than the present option.

Development of a viable alternative ought to be the lifelong companion of all criticism. As should be the maxim that ‘there is no such thing as a free lunch’. There are no options without cost – at least, not with matters of great importance. We need to accept the cost, but minimise it to the best of our abilities while maximising the benefits. And we need to accept compromise.

Above all, we need to keep in the back of our mind at all times: what is the next best option?




One response

19 06 2010
James Gray

What is the “next best option” or “best option?” The fact that you say “next best” makes me think that you’ve given up on getting the best option in many cases.

Sometimes watered down policies can be worse than nothing in the sense that the fight is over and people decide to stop trying to get the appropriate policies through.

Again, nothing is wrong with entirely negative criticisms. The real problem you seem to be alluding to is simply fallacious thinking, such as:

1. Evolution can’t yet explain X.
2. Therefore, evolution is false.

Problems and objections are not sufficient to prove something is wrong, non-preferable, or false.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: